Ken Baker: Wisdom Christian College Student Forum


Celebrate Christmas the Puritan way!
December 17, 2007, 4:43 pm
Filed under: Puritan, Puritan Theology, Puritanism

In the mid-17th century, a wave of religious reform transformed the way in which Christmas was celebrated in England. Oliver Cromwell — a statesman and General responsible for leading the parliamentary army during the English Civil War — took over England in 1645. Supported by his Puritan forces, Cromwell believed it was his mission to cleanse the country of decadence.

In 1644 he enforced an Act of Parliament banning Christmas celebrations. Christmas was regarded by the Puritans as a wasteful festival that threatened core Christian beliefs. Consequently, all activities relating to Christmas, including attending mass, were forbidden. Not surprisingly, the ban was hugely unpopular and many people continued to celebrate Christmas secretly.

The Puritan War on Christmas lasted until 1660. Under the Commonwealth, mince pies, holly and other popular customs fell victim to the spirited Puritan attempt to eradicate every last remnant of merrymaking during the Christmas period.

In the first half of the 17th century Christmas was an important religious festival and a time when the English population would indulge in a variety of traditional pastimes. The 25th December was a public holiday, during which all places of work closed and people attended special church services. The next eleven days included additional masses, with businesses open sporadically and for shorter hours than usual. During the twelve days of Christmas, buildings were dressed with rosemary, holly and ivy and families attended Christmas Day mass. As well as marking the day’s religious elements, there was also non-stop dancing, singing, drinking, exchanging of presents and stage plays. The population indulged in feasts of roast beef, plum porridge, minced pies and special ale. Twelfth Night, the final day of celebration, often saw a fresh bout of feasting and carnivals.

It’s no surprise that the daily celebrations often led to drunkenness, promiscuity, gambling and other forms of excess. Sixteenth and seventeenth century Puritans frowned on what they saw as a frenzy of disorder and disturbance. In the Late 1500’s, Philip Stubbes, a strict protestant expressed the Puritan view in his famed book The Anatomie of Abuses, when he noted:

‘More mischief is that time committed than in all the year besides … What dicing and carding, what eating and drinking, what banqueting and feasting is then used … to the great dishonour of God and the impoverishing of the realm.’

As well as disliking the waste and debauchery that went along with the celebration of Christmas, the Puritans viewed the festival (Christ’s mass) as an unwanted remnant of the Roman Catholic Church and, therefore, a tool of encouragement for the dissentient community that remained in both England and Wales. They argued that nowhere in the Bible had God called upon his people to celebrate the nativity in this manner. They proposed a stricter observance of Sundays, the Lord’s Day, along with banning the immoral celebration of Christmas — as well as Easter, Whitsun and saints’ days. Preferring to call the period Christ-tide, and thus removing the Catholic ‘mass’ element, the Puritans reasoned that it should remain only as a day of fasting and prayer.

King Charles I had largely supported the existing traditions and festivities but, as control passed to the Long Parliament in the mid 1600’s, Parliament set in motion their idea of completely eradicating the celebration of Christmas.

Shortly before the Civil War had begun in January 1642, Charles I had accorded Parliament’s request to make the last Wednesday in each month a day of fasting.

In January 1645 parliament enlisted the help of a group of ministers to create a Directory of Public Worship establishing a new organisation of the church and new forms of worship that were to be adopted and followed in both England and Wales. According to the Directory, the population was to strictly observe Sundays as holy days and were not to recognise other festival days, including Christmas, since they had no biblical justification.

Parliamentary legislation embraced the Directory of Public Worship as the only legal form of worship allowed in England and Wales. Two years later Parliament reinstated the law by passing an Ordinance affirming the abolition of the feasts of Christmas, Easter and Whitsun.

Oliver Cromwell regarded Charles I as an insurgent secret Catholic who was subverting the Protestant faith. The Stuart King was deposed and executed by Cromwell in 1649 and for the next four years England was run by Parliament. But Cromwell had other plans. He regarded the current system as ineffective and damaging to the country. Supported by the army, on 20 April 1653 he led a body of musketeers to Westminster and forcibly expelled parliament. He then established himself as Lord Protector and moved in to the Palace of Whitehall. The spectacular Banqueting House is the only complete building of Whitehall to remain standing to this day. The Palace was famously taken from Cardinal Wolsey by Henry VIII and acted as the Royal residence until the ascension of James I.

The Puritans believed that you would be welcomed in to heaven as long as you worked hard in your lifetime, thus, enjoyment for enjoyments sake was highly disapproved of. Cromwell ordered for inns and playhouses to be shut down, most sports were banned and those caught swearing would receive a fine. Women caught working on the Sabbath could be put in the stocks. They had to wear a long black dress, a white apron, a white headdress and no makeup. The men had an equally sober appearance, dressed head to toe in black and sporting short hair.
All shops and markets were to stay open throughout the 25th December and anyone caught holding or attending a special Christmas church service would suffer a penalty.

In the city of London things were even stricter as soldiers were ordered to patrol the streets, seizing any food they discovered was being prepared for a Christmas celebration.

Despite imposing such rigid measures on the common people, it appears that Cromwell himself didn’t quite live up to his preaching. He liked music, playing bowls and hunting and, after becoming Lord Protectorate, soon took to the high life. For his daughter’s wedding he even permitted a lavish feast and entertainment fit for royalty.

In 1656 legislation was passed to ensure that Sundays were more stringently observed as the Lord’s Day and, thus, a day of rest. The regular monthly fast day had always been hugely unpopular and impossible to enforce and was subsequently dissolved.

Despite the threat of fines and punishment many people continued to celebrate Christmas clandestinely. The ban had never been popular and many people still held mass on the 25th December to mark Christ’s nativity also marked the day as a secular holiday. In the late 1640s Cromwell tried to put a stop to these public celebrations and force businesses to stay open. As a result, violent encounters took place between supporters and opponents of Christmas in many towns, including London, Canterbury and Norwich.

Cromwell was Lord Protector until his death in 1658, whereby Charles II was enthusiastically welcomed back to England to take the throne as the country’s rightful heir.

With the restoration of the monarchy in 1661, Oliver Cromwell was once more a despised figure. Cromwell was originally buried with great ceremony in Westminster Abbey, a famous gothic church in London that houses the tombs of kings and queens dating back to Edward the Confessor, as well as countless memorials to distinguished English subjects. Upon taking the throne, one of the King’s first orders was to exhume Cromwell’s lifeless body and take it to be hung at Tyburn gallows, at the top of Hyde Park near Marble Arch in London. This was the first permanent gallows to be established in London in 1196 and was the main site for public executions until 1783. This site is also famous because 105 Catholic martyrs were put to their deaths here from 1535 to 1681. A convent — founded in 1901 — now stands on the site, in which around 20 nuns live and work. Visitors are welcome to visit the church, which contains several Catholic relics.

Cromwell’s body was decapitated and his head displayed at Westminster Hall for over 20 years. Finished in 1099 this is the oldest surviving section of the Palace of Westminster. The trials of William Wallace, Sir Thomas Moore, Guy Fawkes and King Charles I all took place here, so it was a fitting site at which to display Cromwell’s treacherous head. After changing hands over the next three centuries, in 1960 Cromwell’s head was finally laid to rest at Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge, which he had attended in 1616 to 1617.

Once Charles II was restored to the throne, all legislation banning Christmas — enforced from 1642 to 1660 — was dropped and the common people were once again allowed to mark the Twelve Days of Christmas. Old traditions were revived with renewed enthusiasm and Christmas was celebrated throughout the country as both a religious and secular festival.

http://www.timetravel-britain.com/05/Dec/ban.shtml



Non-conformity and the Puritan spirit
December 1, 2007, 12:37 pm
Filed under: Puritan, Puritan Theology, Puritanism, Reformed

Many of the Puritans were suspended from their ministry, and/or excommunicated for ‘non-conformity.’ To most Christians today, the matter of conformity and non-conformity are at least unknown, and at best considered to be irrelevant. But the story of the Protestant faith in Great Britain and America is that of men who, for the sake of conscience, guided by Scripture, could not conform to the dictates of their church. And the matters becomes more confusing–at least in our day, and most likely in their own–when we consider that the Church of England at that time was not considered by anyone to be apostate! So we have thousands of godly ministers being suspended from the ministry, stripped of their licenses to preach, and excommunicated by a Christian church, which still believed in justification by faith alone, the deity of Christ, the faithful preaching of the Word, and church discipline.

Some questions surely arise, such as: What were the issues? Why couldn’t they all ‘just get along’? How can we be so impressed with men who were disciplined out of a Christian church? Would we admire a Jeremiah Burroughs as much if we thought of him as a suspended, excommunicated minister? Would we have him in our pulpits today if he were alive? In this essay, we hope to shed some light on some of these questions. (more…)



The Puritans and the Bible
November 16, 2007, 2:49 pm
Filed under: Puritan, Puritan Theology, Puritanism, Reformed, Uncategorized

 1.    What was the general approach of the Puritans to the Bible? 

Puritanism was a spiritual movement that impacted Christian life, the declaration of the gospel, and ministry in local churches. Puritans applied their religious views at work, in the home, in carrying out social action and in education. They attempted to regulate their church worship by their understanding of God’s directives for local congregations. All of their beliefs and practices came from the contents of Scripture. “Puritanism was, above all else, a Bible movement.” The most characteristic feature of Puritanism was its respect for Scripture and its desire to know and carry out all its prescriptions. J. I. Packer (Among God’s Giants) has suggested several principles that characterized the general manner in which the Puritans approached Scripture.   (more…)



Examining Puritan documents
November 14, 2007, 10:38 pm
Filed under: Puritan, Puritan Theology, Puritanism

For the last few seminars we have been examining some documents on the nature of church in puritan theology. Next week we will develop our study through the theological statements of the Shorter Catechism, so please follow the links below (check the posts in the puritan category) and make sure you’ve read it thoroughly before next class.

Here are the seminar outlines, introducing a)  the-westminster-assembly.ppt b) the-savoy-platform-1658.ppt and c) puritanism-lecture-8.ppt the Overview seminar to the whole period.

This last one will prove useful to those students electing to do the assignment on “The Theological Roots of Puritanism” (which is due in about four weeks!).



Another Crash Course in Puritan History
November 12, 2007, 10:19 am
Filed under: Puritan, Puritan Theology, Puritanism

Another excellent post from theconventicle.blogspot.com which offers  crash course in Puritan studies through a glance at the lives of a few key individuals.

Please check out their website for a cornucopia of good things.

 John Field (1545–158 8) – the brief Wikipedia entry belies his importance as chief organizer of puritan networks across England during the Elizabethan period

Thomas Cartwright (1535–1603) – divine, writer who locked horns with Whitgift and trumpeted presbyterian ecclesiology

John Whitgift (1530–1604) – Archbishop of Canterbury from 1583 until his death; most aggressive foe of puritanism during the Elizabethan period

William Perkins (1558–1602) – the first great systematic theologian of puritan Calvinist theology; also noted for his preaching and writings (for both learned and popular audiences)

Laurence Chaderton (1536?–1640) – divine, founding father of ‘moderate puritanism’ whose long life spanned Elizabethan and Stuart eras

William Laud (1573–1645) – Archbishop of Canterbury from 1633 to 1645; staunchly enforced a high Anglicanism in opposition to puritan sentiments; Laud is the main reason many went to New England for relief

Richard Baxter (1615–1691) – Civil War chaplain, pastor and prolific writer

John Owen (1616–1683) – easily the most prominent puritan theologian of the 17th century

Cotton Mather (1663–172 8) – important New England minister and writer

Jonathan Edwards (1703–175 8) – some consider the titan Edwards a ‘neo-puritan’ because he was part of a later generation of New Englanders, but his life and theology are consistent with the older tradition



Puritanism: Confessions & Catechisms of the Reformed Church
November 5, 2007, 9:36 pm
Filed under: Puritan, Puritan Theology, Puritanism, Reformed


Puritan Theology: John Owen on the Spirit in the Life of Christ
November 1, 2007, 7:18 pm
Filed under: Puritan Theology

200404_162_owen.jpg

John Owen On The Spirit In The Life Of Christ

by Sinclair B. Ferguson

[For two decades now the Trust has been committed to republishing and keeping in print the works of John Owen. All over the English-speaking world there exists testimony to the incalculable value of his biblical teaching in many vital areas of Christian doctrine and experience. For some time now, our associate editor Sinclair B. Ferguson has been working on a book on Owen’s theology, under the unifying theme of the Christian life. Last month the Trust published his extensive exposition of Owen’s teaching, John Owen on the Christian Life.While this is the first book-length study of Owen’s theology ever to be published, Sinclair Ferguson’s main aim has been to make Owen more accessible. As well as providing an exposition of many areas of Owen’s teaching, John Owen on the Christian Life also serves as a ‘reader’s guide’ to Owen’s writings. In both these ways it will serve pastors, teachers and all serious Christians in their study in those areas in which John Owen has proved to be a true doctor of the church.The article which follows, the substance of an address given at the Leicester Ministers’ Conference, 1986, while not an extract from John Owen on the Christian Life, yet serves to illustrate the rich veins of teaching to be found almost everywhere in Owen’s writings.][Reprinted from the Banner of Truth Magazine, Issues 293-294, Feb.-March 1988.]  (more…)



Puritanism: Bluffer’s Guide
November 1, 2007, 12:46 pm
Filed under: Puritan, Puritan Theology, Puritanism

Here’s a quick bluffer’s guide (courtesy of Wikpedia)  to the Puritan period under review for those who performed …um…less well in this week’s test….

1559
The Elizabethan Religious Settlement

1563-67
The ‘Vestments Controversy’

1588-89
The ‘Marprelate Controversy’

1604
The Hampton Court Conference

1620
The founding of Plymouth Colony in New England (by separatists)

1629
The founding of Massachusetts Bay Colony in New England (by non-separatists)

1642-51
The English Civil War

1643-49
The Westminster Assembly

1660-62
The Act of Uniformity/The Great Ejection

1720s-30s
The First Great Awakening



Puritanism: Lectures/ Assignment update
October 29, 2007, 11:59 am
Filed under: Assignments 07, Puritan, Puritan Theology, Puritanism

Here are the next two ppt lecture outlines: puritniasm-lecture-6.ppt and puritanism-lecture-5.ppt. I’ve posted below on the Puritan take on the theatre, but this week’s seminar will follow the story of the Puritans in the New World and the developing American ideology.

I’ve enjoyed the outlines on Pilgrims Progress received so far. Check out habiba ’s website. Also jean baptiste and Tessy , who have -it seems to me- to have some good advice to offer the rest of us here. Habiba has a handle on what a lesson plan should look like; J-B has made that all-important link with the Puritan context (I mean, that this whole project is teaching us about Puritanism and not about teaching Christianity); and Tessy has done a first draft of the entire project.

In this week’s class I shall attempt to team some of you up in a computer workshop so that we can bring everyone up to speed on the PP project. You might also consider  Samson ’s technique of doing the lesson plan on a powerpoint presentation?

Finally on this: check the category Assignments 07 to make sure that you are going to get clear through all this study (with the extra bits) so that you can enjoy a stress-free Christmas!



The Puritans and the Theatre
October 29, 2007, 10:29 am
Filed under: Puritan, Puritan Theology, Puritanism

The Puritans were an influential minority of Protestants who were dissatisfied with the Elizabethan Settlement. (One commented that Anglicanism was “a crooked compromise betwixt two religions.”) The Puritans desired a simpler Church ritual and doctrine more in line with Calvinism –a return to what they conceived as the “pure” form of the early Christian Church. (However, their name was given to them by their detractors, who scorned “Pure-itan” self-righteousness.) Defining Anglican or Puritan belief is difficult because both groups had overlapping aims and ideals. There was no common creed that set Puritans apart, and Anglican doctrine was ambiguous by its very nature as a middle ground between two religious extremes. But despite ambiguities, uncertainties, and differences of opinion (or faith), religious leaders seemed to share a naïve hope: “May God at length grant that we may all of us think the same things*!” In the same spirit, to promote order and stability, Elizabeth claimed that she strove for a realm without “diversity, variety, contention and vain love of singularity.” (From a letter written to Archbishop Parker in 1565.) When Elizabeth first came to the throne, the twelve or so returned exiles in the House of Commons were influential enough to force Elizabeth to make greater concessions to the Calvinists than she may have intended. But after the initial settlement the Queen forbade Parliament to initiate religious legislation of any sort. (Later she even commanded that religion not be discussed, thus exercising her right to set limits on “freedom” of speech.) Although the Queen’s ruling against legislating religion was ignored time and again, bills that passed both Houses were promptly vetoed. These included a 1571 bill to reform the Prayer Book and several later bills to enforce stricter observation of the Sabbath. As the Puritans became better organized, they had some success influencing elections; but their motions in Parliament to adopt the Calvinist Prayer Book twice failed, and a petition to allow Puritan freedom of conscience was lost in Church bureaucracy*.

Censorship

Despite good organization and brilliant pamphlet campaigns, the Puritans could make little progress against Elizabeth’s resistance to change; in 1586 Star Chamber decreed the establishment of the Stationer’s Company, which was empowered to censor all writings before they were published and to hunt down unlicensed printing presses. The Puritans eventually achieved a measure of victory for their cause. Click to read more* about it.  Further reading on this topic. Given that the Puritans were adamantly opposed to the theatres, constantly trying to close* them, it is not surprising that there were some devastating parodies of the Puritan mentality on the stage. Shakespeare’s art tends to the ironical rather than the satirical; but there is at least one caricature in his plays aimed at the Puritans: Malvolio* in Twelfth Night. More savage are Ben Jonson’s parodies of the Puritans as Tribulation Wholesome and Zeal-of-the-Land Busy in The Alchemist and Bartholomew Fair: both are shown to be corrupt, worldly, and self-seeking.

Zeal being zealous

Zeal-of-the-Land Busy interrupts a puppet show, claiming it to be worship of a heathenish idol. Jonson deliciously picks up the rhythms of the evangelist preaching:

Down with Dagon, down with Dagon; ’tis I will no longer endure your profanations. . . that idol, that heathenish idol, that remains, as I may say, a beam*, a very beam, not a beam of the sun, nor a beam of the mood, nor a beam of a balance, neither a house-beam, nor a weaver’s beam, but a beam in the eye, in the eye of the brethren; a very great beam; an exceeding great beam; such as are your stage-players, rhymers, and morris-dancers.  (5.5.1-11)

Zeal is defeated in his argument with one of the puppets, as he had earlier discovered excellent (if hypocritical) reasons for enjoying the other sights of the fair he had come to castigate. Fighting for the stage The players waged a running battle with the Mayor of London and his Council; the theatres were eventually closed by the Puritan Parliament in 1643.

1.Malvolio

The name means “evil-wishing.” Malvolio is sanctimoniously opposed to revelry.

2.Practicing what he preaches?

Zeal is referring to the passage from the Sermon on the Mount: “why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?” (Matthew 7:3). Further reading on this topic Zeal-of-the-Land Busy may have been defeated in Jonson’s satire of the puritan attitude to the theatre, but his brethren in parliament were increasingly active: in September of 1642 the puritan parliament by edict forbade all stage plays and closed the theatres. They rapidly fell into disrepair and neglect; at the Restoration in 1660, only the Red Bull was still intact, and soon it too was superseded by the new, indoor theatres with their proscenium arches, and French traditions in acting–in particular, women were for the first time seen as actors. Few of the great writers for the theatre were still active when the theatres were closed. John Ford, and James Shirley* were still alive, but only William Davenant carried the older traditions into the new period.

The edict

Whereas. . . the distracted estate of England, threatened with a cloud of blood by a civil war, calls for all pallible means go appease and avert the wrath of God, . . . it is therefore thought fit and ordained by the Lords and Commons in this Parliament assembled, that . . . public stage plays shall cease and be forborne.

Further reading on this topic.

the-puritans-and-the-theatre.doc  Here’s a printer-friendly mode with pics (!)