Ken Baker: Wisdom Christian College Student Forum


“Will I find faith on earth?” The new cultural divide
December 15, 2007, 2:08 pm
Filed under: Atheist, CONTEMPORISMS, Christianity, God, Searching for God

Britain’s new cultural divide is not between Christian and Muslim, Hindu and Jew. It is between those who have faith and those who do not. Stuart Jeffries reports on the vicious and uncompromising battle between believers and non-believers

The GuardianProtesters from different faiths join to oppose proposed new regulations on gay adoption
Protesters from different faiths join to oppose proposed new regulations on gay adoption. Photograph: Martin Godwin
 

The American journalist HL Mencken once wrote: “We must accept the other fellow’s religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart.” In Britain today, such wry tolerance is diminishing. (more…)



Becoming the church
October 13, 2007, 11:39 am
Filed under: CONTEMPORISMS, Church, NEW TESTAMENT, PRACTICAL MINISTRY

Isn’t it time we returned to biblical practices in our churches? John Piper has noted:

So even though growth and upbuilding are from Christ, the head, it is the whole body that builds the body. And the word “whole” is important. The whole body builds the body. That point is emphasized in the words, “according to the working of each individual part.” The whole body — that is, each individual part in the body properly functioning — causes the growth of the body. Now I ask you, where and how does that happen in your corporate church life? Can we ever create enough programs that every person would be involved using some particular gift? That’s probably not even the right question to ask. Isn’t it more likely that Paul envisions a kind of regular gathering of the body in groups small enough so that every member of the body can minister to others with his own unique spiritual gifts?  

God’s idea of the church is utterly different from ours. And it is high time we reported to His headquarters for His pattern. Religious activity is not synonymous with spirituality. The church at Ephesus proved that (Rev 2:1-7). One suspects that we are turning our attention to “seekers” partly to hide our embarrassment at not knowing what to do as church. It is a humiliating time when Christians should be red-faced with shame rather than strutting about with “success.” (more…)



Even the Prime minister sometimes has to stand naked
June 11, 2007, 11:18 am
Filed under: CONTEMPORISMS, Uncategorized

Expulsion from Paradise, by Michael Sandle, on display at the Royal Academy Summer Exhibition 2007

I guess you’ve seen this in the news last week. It certainly says something about public perception of the UK’s involvement in a deeply unpopular war.

The centre-piece of the Royal Academy of Arts.summer show is this enormous triptych, with the Prime Minister and his wife portrayed naked as Adam and Eve being expelled from 10 Downing Street. 

Interesting how readily the Bible supplies relevant imagery for contemporary truth-telling.  What truth, though? It is intended as a judgment on Blair’s support for the invasion of Iraq. The artist, Michael Sandle, said that he was so angry with the loss of life, the chaos and the futility of the war, that he had dashed off the huge work, measuring 4m by 1.3m, in a matter of days.In the central panel, Tony and Cherie Blair are seen leaving Downing Street, in a chalk and charcoal sketch inspired by the Old Testament story of Adam and Eve being expelled from the Garden of Eden. They are flanked by one panel showing a British soldier beating Iraqi prisoners and another showing corpses piled up to the windows of Downing Street.In the Telegraph Sandle is reported as saying that as a lifelong atheist he was outraged by Mr Blair’s recent remarks that God would be his judge on the morality of going to war and he decided to take the story of Paradise Lost and Adam and Eve’s temptation by Satan as his inspiration.  It’s a deeply unpleasant picture. But then sometimes truth is, isn’t it? Make no mistake: one is right and one is wrong. Blair intimates that God directed the military intervention and Sandle suggests that Satan tempted him.  In a strange way, it reminds me of Picasso’s Guernica. Guernica was another massive mural (quite a bit bigger, actually, at 7.8m x 3.5m). They both assail you with an overwhelming sense of pointless suffering. They are both black and white,. Somehow this contrasts with the intensity of the scene depicted and invokes the immediacy of a newspaper photograph. Sandle actually used photographs –perhaps to create something of this very effect.One vital difference though:  Guernica presents a scene of death, violence, brutality, suffering, and helplessness without portraying their immediate causes. The Blair Triptych provides no such ambiguity. In Sandle’s mind the  villain takes centre stage.And this brings the second connection to my mind: the old Bob Dylan line from the angry invective that makes up “It’s alright Ma” (1965):

Goodness hides behind its gates
But even the president of the United States
Sometimes must have
To stand naked.

 The idea is that be you so high and mighty, you cannot evade the final uncovering. Truth will out. “There is a day for all that is proud and lofty.” 

So maybe Sandle and Blair are in total agreement after all. God will certainly be Blair’s judge, even as he is ours. We are all accountable for what we have done. What do you think?



Wilberforce: “feelingly alive…”
May 29, 2007, 7:39 am
Filed under: CONTEMPORISMS, PRACTICAL MINISTRY, THEOLOGY

 

“If to be feelingly alive to the sufferings of my fellow creatures is to be a fanatic, I am one of the most incurable fanatics ever permitted to be at large.”

- William Wilberforce, 1759- 1833, the British abolitionist and subject of the recent film Amazing Grace



The woman at the well?
May 28, 2007, 9:50 pm
Filed under: CONTEMPORISMS, Christianity


Ricky Gervais on Creation
May 24, 2007, 4:46 pm
Filed under: Bible, CONTEMPORISMS

Watch the clip http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaEj3g5GOYA and reply in the box.

Offended? Challenged? Spurred to write a) angry letter b) reasoned rebuttal?



Chimps more evolved than humans?
May 10, 2007, 8:32 am
Filed under: CONTEMPORISMS

The following article was featured on Yahoo! News last month. Creation science comments will be proffered in italicized font after each major point of the article.

Jeanna Bryner
LiveScience Staff Writer
LiveScience.com

Since the human-chimp split about 6 million years ago, chimpanzee genes can be said to have evolved more than human genes, a new study suggests.

No one today was alive six-million years ago. The figure of “six-million years” depends greatly upon errant trust in radio-carbon dating methods as well as a grand imagination to believe the molecules-to-man philosophy. And as always, the words “a new study suggests” plainly reveal the ever-changing word of science as opposed to the never-changing Word of God.

The results, detailed online this week in the Proceedings of the large brains, cognitive abilities and bi-pedalism. (more…)



Response: The Church of the Covenant
May 9, 2007, 6:38 pm
Filed under: CONTEMPORISMS, INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE

 The church is the heir and fulfilment of Israel. The heart of Israel’s creed was given by Jesus to his church as its own: “Hear O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one; and you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength” (Mark 12:12f). Peter referred to Christians as the “elect… sojourners of the Dispersion” -an expression describing the old Israel- and then proceeded consistently to apply those descriptions of Israel to the church (1 Peter 1:1; 2:5-10). The writer to the Hebrews calls the new covenant in Jesus which brought the church into being, a covenant with the “house of Israel” (Heb 8:8). Paul called Christians “the true circumcision” (Phil 3:3), the “children of Abraham” (Rom 4:16-25), “the commonwealth of Israel” (Eph 2:12), and, explicitly, “the Israel of God” (Gal 6:6). (more…)



Pope Benedict: Covenant, Church, Israel
May 9, 2007, 6:36 pm
Filed under: CONTEMPORISMS, INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE

mroc.jpgFrom Cardinal Ratzinger’s 1997 essay on the Catechism’s treatment of the relation between the Church and Israel:

The mission of Jesus consists in bringing together the histories of the nations in the community of the history of Abraham, the history of Israel. His mission is unification, reconciliation, as the Letter to the Ephesians (2:18-22) will then present it. The history of Israel should become the history of all, Abraham’s sonship is to be extended to the “many”. (more…)



What is the church? (Notes from a talk)
May 3, 2007, 11:02 pm
Filed under: CONTEMPORISMS, INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE

leaving-arriving.gif 

These notes from a talk I gave on the nature of the church may help you think through your Doctrine assignment. Let me know if you would like further information. They are posted on the website of our church plant at http://riversmeeting.wordpress.com

  •  The Nature of the Church: Popular conceptions: a club (Society of the Prevention    of  Cruelty to People?, a religious show? The NT conception of the Church ecclesia, the Hebrew idea of assembly qahal; temple of the Spirit. Characteristics: divine not human, fellowship not institution; corporate not individualistic; universal not local;  body of the living Christ; exisitng not for her own sake but solely for the glory of God. 
  • The Life of the Church : Man’s tragedy and God’s solution; Pentecost and unity; proclamation and witness; fellowship and family; service and worship.
  • The Historic Roots of the Church: The Covenant and its response; grace and responsibility; worship; the new covenant in Jesus.
  • The Lord of the Church: The apostolic testimony to Jesus; pre-existence and incarnation; the servant Lord; the cross; the resurrection and ascension; the centrality of Christ.
  • The Faith of the Church: Jesus is Lord!;an inclusive lordship; a real lordship; the final manifestation of his lordship.
  • The Worship of the Church: what does worship mean? The necessity of corporate worship; the place of ritual?; the elements of worship; the sacraments.
  • The Mission of the Church: the centrality of mission; the motive for mission; the sphere of mission; the dynamic for mission.
  • The Unity of the Church: the church is one; disunity is always sinful; excuses for disunity; unity is not uniformity; unity is God’s gift; eucumenicity and the generous spirit.