Archive for the ‘Bible’ Category

Why should we do evangelism relationally? Acts suggests several reasons:

• to have fellowship (Acts 9:19, 26-28);
• to have companionship (18:18; 19:29; 20:34; 27:1-2; 28:15);
• to have protection (9:30; 17:15; 20:2-4);
• to have encouragement (28:15);
• to form an official delegation to attend the Jerusalem Council (15:2) and
• to deliver famine relief (11:30; 20:4);
• to provide for material needs (18:1-3;19 24:23; 27:3; 28:14);
• to engage in the ministry of edification (11:25-26; 14:21-23; 15:35; 15:40-41; 16:4-5; 19:9; 20:6-38);
• and to engage in the ministry of proclamation (9:28-30; 13:1-5, 13-16, 44-46; 14:1, 7, 20-21, 25; 17:1-15; 18:5-8).

(more…)

In our culture, the activity of evangelism is often atomized, and individualized. This fits in well with the prevailing worldview of Western Europeanized societies. The concept of celebrity feeds the illusion of individual triumph in areas of beauty, wealth and talent –Do you have the X factor? No one wants to face the fact of their insignificance; and so we cluster around the limelight for our few minutes of fame. Within the subculture of westernized churches of this culture, the same impulse persists. Consequentially, conversion is seen as a solitary decision and evangelism as a one-to-one activity (even in mass crusades the invitation is made one to one). We are invited to make Jesus our “personal Lord.” Notable conversions are celebrated in books, films and Christian conferences.

By comparison with our individualistic approach, Paul lived and worked closely with other believers in active fellowship. His co-workers were not disciples, in a formal sense, (though Timothy does look like an apprentice, at least at first), but rather a traveling fellowship, a family. Totting up the names at the end of Paul’s letters and adding those peppered throughout the book of Acts, one arrives at a group of about a hundred traveling Christians. In his doctrine, as in his practice, Paul emphasizes the fellowship, the togetherness, of Christians in worship and action; they are members one of another, and all together members of Christ. And note this: this fellowship is emphasized in their evangelism.

It was thus right the way through Paul’s ministry: Straight after conversion he joins with the Damascus believers (Acts 9:19), links with the Jerusalem group (v. 26), and stays with the apostles (v. 28). He ministers with Barnabas for a year in Antioch (11:25-26), and goes on his first missionary journey with Barnabas and John Mark (13:2-5). Then he travels with Barnabas and other believers to the Jerusalem Council (15:2).

Later he sets out with Silas (15:40); recruits Timothy in Lystra (16:3) and in Troas, they are joined by Luke—attested by the abrupt change in the Lucan narrative from “they” (v. 8) to “we” (v. 10)—and all four of them travel to Philippi together (16:12-18). From Philippi, Paul, Silas, and Timothy travel as a team to Thessalonica, leaving Luke in Philippi, as noted by the “they” in the narrative (17:1-15). They work together in Thessalonica and Berea until Paul has to be removed from danger (vv. 13-15). Though Paul works alone in Athens –briefly- he does so while waiting for Silas and Timothy to join him (v. 16). He goes on to Corinth, where he stays with Aquila and Priscilla, presumably in ministry with them and also sharing work opportunities (18:1-3).

Silas and Timothy join Paul in Corinth (v. 5). From 1 Thessalonians 3:6 it seems that when they arrived in Corinth, they brought Paul an account of the Thessalonica situation, which prompted his first letter to the church there. Paul’s second letter to them was probably also written from Corinth, not too much later. Importantly, both of these letters were sent by Paul, Silas, and Timothy, as seen from the opening verse of each letter, and from the fact that both letters were almost completely written in the plural (apart from 1 Thess 2:18 and 2 Thess 2:5; 3:17). In fact in all but two of his letters to churches (Romans and Ephesians), Paul included others with him in the opening greetings. The point is this: even his letter-writing was collaborative.

At Corinth, Aquila and Priscilla join the group, traveling with Paul to Ephesus, and remaining there to work with Apollos, while Paul journeys on to Caesarea and Antioch (Acts 18:18-22). A little later, Paul goes through Asia Minor back to Ephesus (18:23; 19:1).The opposition in Ephesus forces a transfer from synagogue to “the lecture hall of Tyrannus”, taking the disciples with him (19:9). His associates are carefully described: Timothy and Erastus “ministered to him” in Ephesus in v. 22; Gaius and Aristarchus are called his “traveling companions” in v. 29. When Paul travels on to Macedonia, he does so with a team of seven men (Sosipater, Aristarchus, Secundus, Gaius, Timothy, Tychicus, and Trophimus; 20:4). Joining Paul again at Philippi (20:5-6), Luke stayed with Paul on his trip back to Jerusalem (21:15) and on to Rome (27:1; 28:16). In his farewell discourse to the Ephesian elders Paul referred to “my companions” (20:34), for whom he provided by working with his own hands.

Arriving in Jerusalem, Paul was received by the brethren, James, and the elders (21:17-18). Later in Caesarea, Felix told a guard to “permit [Paul's] friends to take care of his needs” as a prisoner (24:23). Besides Luke, Aristarchus accompanied Paul on his trip to Rome (27:1-2). In Sidon, the centurion guard allowed Paul to go ashore so that “his friends … might provide for his needs” (27:3). In Italy, Paul was met and cared for by the brethren in Puteoli (28:14), and on his trip to Rome he was met by brethren who came down from the capital city to accompany him (v. 15). At the sight of these companions Paul thanked God and was encouraged (v. 15).

From this sketch, it is evident that evangelism in the early church had a different flavour to ours. It emphasized mobility, simplicity, mutuality and urgency. It emphasized the principle that in mission we travel together. Further, in that activity of traveling, the group exemplifies the body of Christ: a diversity of gifting operating to one end. It seems quite a different story from the current view of evangelism undertaken by paid professionals or an activity happening within static premises. That whole invidious concept of “church” as a holy place to which people must be brought is totally alien to the New Testament picture, of course, but- more so- here the Biblical evidence suggests a traveling community. Where is that exemplified in the years since? One thinks of the early experiences of YWAM, the Chinese House Church movement, Wesley’s networking of class meetings and leaders in the eighteenth century and …fill in your own blanks from a hundred other incidents of church history. The message is apparent: whenever the kingdom has expanded quickly it has utilized the methodology of Acts.

What is a prophet?

Posted: September 24, 2009 in Bible, Bible Studies, Old Testament, PROPHETS

What is a Prophet?
Many people today think of a prophet as any person who sees the future. While the gift of prophecy certainly includes the ability to see the future, a prophet is far more than just a person with that ability.

A prophet is basically a spokesman for God, a person chosen by God to speak to people on G-d’s behalf and convey a message or teaching. Prophets were role models of holiness, scholarship and closeness to God. They set the standards for the entire community.

The Hebrew word for a prophet, navi (Nun-Beit-Yod-Alef) comes from the term niv sefatayim meaning “fruit of the lips,” which emphasizes the prophet’s role as a speaker.

The Talmud teaches that there were hundreds of thousands of prophets: twice as many as the number of people who left Egypt, which was 600,000. But most of the prophets conveyed messages that were intended solely for their own generation and were not reported in scripture. Scripture identifies only 55 prophets of Israel.

A prophet is not necessarily a man. Scripture records the stories of seven female prophets, listed below, and the Talmud reports that Sarah’s prophetic ability was superior to Abraham’s.

A prophet is not necessarily a Jew. The Talmud reports that there were prophets among the gentiles (most notably Balaam, whose story is told in Numbers 22), although they were not as elevated as the prophets of Israel (as the story of Balaam demonstrates). And some of the prophets, such as Jonah, were sent on missions to speak to the gentiles.

According to some views, prophecy is not a gift that is arbitrarily conferred upon people; rather, it is the culmination of a person’s spiritual and ethical development. When a person reaches a sufficient level of spiritual and ethical achievement, the Shechinah (Divine Spirit) comes to rest upon him or her. Likewise, the gift of prophecy leaves the person if that person lapses from his or her spiritual and ethical perfection.

The greatest of the prophets was Moses. It is said that Moses saw all that all of the other prophets combined saw, and more. Moses saw the whole of the Torah, including the Prophets and the Writings that were written hundreds of years later. All subsequent prophecy was merely an expression of what Moses had already seen. Thus, it is taught that nothing in the Prophets or the Writings can be in conflict with Moses’ writings, because Moses saw it all in advance.

The Talmud states that the writings of the prophets will not be necessary in the World to Come, because in that day, all people will be mentally, spiritually and ethically perfect, and all will have the gift of prophecy.

Who are the Prophets of the Jewish Scriptures?
The following list of prophets is based on the Talmud and Rashi. Abraham Gen 11:26 – 25:10
Isaac Gen 21:1 – 35:29
Jacob Gen 25:21 – 49:33
Moses Ex. 2:1 – Deut. 34:5
Aaron Ex. 4:14 – Num. 33:39
Joshua Ex. 17:9 – 14, 24:13, 32:17 – 18, 33:11; Num. 11:28 – 29, 13:4 – 14:38; 27:18 – 27:23, Deut. 1:38, 3:28, 31:3, 31:7 -Joshua 24:29
Pinchas Ex. 6:25; Num. 25:7-25:11; Num. 31:6; Josh. 22:13 – Josh. 24:33; Judges 20:28
Elkanah I Samuel 1:1 – 2:20
Eli I Samuel 1:9 – 4:18
Samuel I Samuel 1:1 – I Samuel 25:1
Gad I Sam 22:5; II Sam 24:11-19; I Chron 21:9-21:19, 29:29
Nathan II Sam 7:2 – 17; 12:1 – 25.
David I Sam 16:1 – I Kings 2:11
Solomon II Sam 12:24; 1 Kings 1:10 – 11:43
Iddo II Chron 9:29, 12:15, 13:22
Michaiah son of Imlah I Kings 22:8-28; II Chron 18:7-27
Obadiah I Kings 18; Obadiah
Ahiyah the Shilonite I Kings 11:29-30; 12:15; 14:2-18; 15:29
Jehu son of Hanani I Kings 16:1 – 7; II Chron 19:2; 20:34
Azariah son of Oded II Chron 15
Jahaziel the Levite II Chron 20:14
Eliezer son of Dodavahu II Chron 20:37
Hosea Hosea
Amos Amos
Micah the Morashtite Micah
Amoz (the father of Isaiah)
Elijah I Kings 17:1 – 21:29; II Kings 1:10-2:15, 9:36-37, 10:10, 10:17
Elisha I Kings 19:16-19; II Kings 2:1-13:21
Jonah ben Amittai Jonah
Isaiah Isaiah
Joel Joel
Nahum Nahum
Habakkuk Habakkuk
Zephaniah Zephaniah
Uriah Jeremiah 26:20-23
Jeremiah Jeremiah
Ezekiel Ezekiel
Shemaiah I Kings 12:22-24; II Chron 11:2-4, 12:5-15
Barukh Jeremiah 32, 36, 43, 45
Neriah (father of Barukh)
Seraiah Jeremiah 51:61-64
Mehseiah (father of Neriah)
Haggai Haggai
Zechariah Zechariah
Malachi Malachi
Mordecai Bilshan Esther
Oded (father of Azariah)
Hanani (father of Jehu)
Female Prophets
Sarah Gen 11:29 – 23:20
Miriam Ex. 15:20-21; Num. 12:1-12:15, 20:1
Deborah Judges 4:1 – 5:31
Hannah I Sam 1:1 – 2:21
Abigail I Sam 25:1 – 25:42
Huldah II Kings 22:14-20
Esther Esther

Why is Daniel Not a Prophet?
I am often asked why the Book of Daniel is included in the Writings section of the Tanakh instead of the Prophets section. Wasn’t Daniel a prophet? Weren’t his visions of the future true?

According to Judaism, Daniel is not one of the 55 prophets. His writings include visions of the future, which we believe to be true; however, his mission was not that of a prophet. His visions of the future were never intended to be proclaimed to the people; they were designed to be written down for future generations. Thus, they are Writings, not Prophecies, and are classified accordingly.

New Show About the Old Testament Prophets to Debut on CatholicTV in September
8/14/2009 – 11:53 AM PST

Starting in September, CatholicTV will air a new show entitled “The Prophets and You”. This new show is hosted by Dr. John Clabeaux. Dr. Clabeaux earned a Ph.D. from Harvard University and is an associate professor of Sacred Scripture at Pontifical College Josephinum School of Theology in Columbus, OH.

Dr. Clabeaux says that “Who the prophets were is essential to Christian identity because as believers we are called to be prophets ourselves.”

CatholicTV is a nationally-broadcasted television network headquartered near Boston. CatholicTV streams its broadcast simultaneously, 24 hours a day at http://www.CatholicTV.com

Below are dates and themes for upcoming episodes in September:

Sept. 7 Prophecy: Christian Calling or Church Problem?
Sept. 14 Divine Sympathy: Jeremiah and Elijah
Sept. 21 Prophecy and the Old Testament: Josiah’s Reform
Sept. 28 Amos: God’s Justice

Starting in September, “The Prophets and You” will air each week at CatholicTV.com and on CatholicTV at the following times (EST): Monday-9AM & 8PM; Tuesday-6PM; Thursday-2PM; Friday 12:30AM; Sunday 4:30AM & 9PM

You can watch simply by going online at http://www.CatholicTV.com and following the link.

Introduction to the Prophets

Posted: August 25, 2009 in Bible, Bible Studies

Excellent bibliography on Prophets at http://courses.missouristate.edu/victormatthews/bib/PROPHET.html

 From time to time there are specific queries from students about useful books to purchase to build up a good, rounded NT library. Here’s a selective nt-booklist.docwhich could have been much amplified. Enjoy.

The asterisks mark those of particular importance.

A recent photo of dr-baker-in-his-study.jpg reminded me of the usefulness of internet research.

Here’s a few pointers.

Important websites (“meta-sites”) See the relevant links for Biblical Studies on the useful links pages. A particularly useful site for New Testament work is the New Testament Gateway. For Old Testament / Hebrew Bible, the iTankakh site, Ralph Klein’s OT Studies site, and the OT Gateway are particularly useful. Also helpful is The Text This Week (especially its Scripture Index). New Testament: Barry Smith’s textbook-like course pages You may find Barry Smith’s introductory course pages helpful; they are almost at a point where they would qualify as a substitute for an introductory textbook for NT studies. Old Testament / Hebrew Bible: Barry Bandstra’s textbook As pointed out in the module syllabus booklet, you may find Bandstra’s introductory textbook helpful: Bandstra’s website, which reproduces this book (Bandstra, B 1999. Reading the Old Testament. Rev. ed. Belmont: Wadsworth) is freely available at:
http://www.hope.edu/academic/religion/bandstra/RTOT/RTOT.HTM
Old Testament / Hebrew Bible Introduction There is a useful online ‘Introdution to the Old Testament course up with text / video / audio at the ‘Open Yale Courses’ website:
http://open.yale.edu/courses/religious_studies/introduction-to-the-old-testament-hebrew-bible/home.html
. It’s designed for a US-American college audience, so it’s pretty simple. Worthwhile listening to. You can get the 24 classes as text (transcript), audio (MP3), or various video file types. They are all free to download. Theology Today (journal) It is worth noting that this journal is accessible online; all but the most recent issues may be viewed at
http://theologytoday.ptsem.edu
. Relevant to OT studies are, for example:

Biblica (journal) Similarly, the journal Biblica is available online, though limited to issues from the past five or six years. Of interest may be an essay like:

Bulletin for Biblical Research Now online apart from the most recent volumes, at www.ibr-bbr.org/IBRBulletin/IBR_BBR_ByYearList.aspx. The server is often a little slow, but it’s worth persevering with.Religion Online See also many useful texts at this large site offering online versions of high-quality texts. For example:

  • Knight, D A 1982. Old Testament Ethics. Christian Century Jan. 20, 55. Online version at www.religion-online.org (accessed July 27, 2002).
  • Waetjen, H C 1998. The Origin of Jesus Christ: Matthew 1:1-25. Christian Century (May 20-27, 1998), 524-531. www.religion-online.org

 

Welcome to the Hermeneutics class.

Here the overall plan, subject to approval  maf-hermeneutics.doc. Check out the textbook ASAP. Some initial discussion points are contained in hermeneutics-1.doc   and  hermeneutics-2.doc   with some more recent  issues-in-hermeneutics.doc and a few miscellaeneous articles-on-hermeneutics.doc too. Get reading!

First homework is to set up your own blog and post a Hermeneutics book list of your own discovery plus the feedback from tomorrow’s lecture.

Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you travel about on sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he becomes one, you make him twice as much a son of hell as yourselves,” Matthew 23:15.

An article by Terry Seufferlein
http://www.ovc.edu/missions/jam/pharisee.htm

  Jesus’ denunciation of the Pharisees comes in the middle of an entire chapter of Matthew’s gospel in which Jesus criticizes the practices of the Pharisees. Such harsh criticism merits serious attention and this attention has resulted in several different ideas concerning the passage. (more…)

by Michael CranfordThis article was originally published in New Testament Studies 41 (1995): 71-88.

In Romans 4 Paul turns to the scriptural figure of Abraham, a vivid personification of faith and obedience in Jewish thought. While the most obvious reason for Paul’s depiction of Abraham is to undermine any use of Abraham as a counterexample to his foregoing argument,1 Paul turns the common Jewish conception of Abraham on its head and offers him instead as positive support for his own position.2 The nature of Paul’s argument in the previous two chapters of Romans has been identified by James Dunn and others as rejecting the Jewish assumption that covenant privileges are strictly associated with ethnic Israel and therefore unavailable to Gentiles.3 Over against the Torah, Paul has instead offered faith as the identifier or boundary marker of those who are members in God’s people—a difference which allows Gentiles full participation in the covenant.

Silva remarks that Dunn does not appreciate how damaging Romans 4 is to his position, however, with its sharp antithesis between working and believing. Further, Silva asks why such a critical passage as 4.4-5 has played no significant role in the development of Dunn’s thesis, with the implication that Dunn has intentionally underplayed its importance.4 The relative significance of 4.4-5 has yet to be weighed, but Silva’s criticism is valid. As a latter development in Paul’s argument, the figure of Abraham, with its sharp ‘faith-works’ terminology appropriated by the Reformers, must either follow logically from Dunn’s perspective on Romans 1-3 or else stand at complete odds with it.

A primary issue to be resolved is how the figure of Abraham functions with regard to Paul’s argument in Romans 4. The traditional view is that Abraham is an example of Christian faith, demonstrating how we, as individuals, can be justified. If this is true, then the emphasis of Romans 4 is not primarily on the consequences of Abraham’s belief but on the mechanism of belief itself. Strong support for this comes later in the chapter, Boers argues:

    The decisive factor for the relation between Abraham’s faith and the faith of the believer, according to this chapter, is the fact that it is the same God who is the object of the faith of Abraham (4:17, cf. 5) and of that of the Christian believer (verse 24). The connection between them is established in verse 23 with the statement that the justification that was announced to Abraham, was not announced on his behalf only, ‘but also on our behalf’, i.e., on the behalf of Christian believers.5

Similarly, Hanson concludes, ‘Thus Abraham’s justification fulfils exactly the same function which is required at the point in Romans where it comes: he is the prototype of believing Christians, a sinner (whether from Judaism or from the Gentile world) justified by faith’.6

Proponents of this view naturally set Abraham’s faith over against his good deeds, emphasizing that it was by his faith alone that God pronounced him righteous. Similarly, it is by faith and not good deeds that God now pronounces the Christian righteous. While there are many problems with this view, not the least being that it forces a Western individualistic perspective on a scriptural figure who is consistently viewed as symbolic of his progeny (cf. 4.13), the most critical flaw is that it dichotomizes faith and obedience in a way which would be completely unintelligible to a Jewish reader. As Doughty notes of 4.1-5,

    It is important to recognize . . . that for the pious Jew this argument would hardly have been convincing or even understandable. . . Paul’s interpretation of the Genesis text [15.6] is a tour de force. For the radical distinction he makes here between pistis and erga cannot simply be derived from the text itself. This distinction breaks in such a decisive way with the traditional understanding of Judaism that his interpretation would be impossible for a Jewish reader to comprehend.7

Not only would this dichotomy be unconvincing to the Jewish or Jewish- Christian reader (cf. James 2.17-24), but it stands at odds with Paul’s earlier expressions of the connection between faith and obedience (1.5; 3.3; and implied in 2.7, 10, 13).

The interpretation of Romans 4 offered here is one in which Abraham is not viewed as an example of Christian faith, but is instead used by Paul to show why Gentiles can be considered members of God’s people. Gentiles share in the covenant because they, too, are children of Abraham. As Howard states, ‘The idea is that the Gentiles are blessed not simply like Abraham but because of Abraham’.8 Abraham provides the reason why Gentiles experience salvation, not the example of how an individual becomes saved. In Jewish thought, Abraham was viewed as the paradigm of obedience, but this obedience was directly connected to his having passed on covenant privileges to Israel.9 Paul breaks from this Jewish understanding in Romans 4 by showing that Abraham has passed on covenant privileges to all who believe, and not just to those who are members of ethnic Israel. This break is therefore not over belief and obedience as competing soteriological paradigms, but over Jewish ethnicity and faith as competing boundary markers of God’s people. (more…)