Ken Baker: Wisdom Christian College Student Forum


Ready to go? The second semester looms…

Now that the next semester is looming (!) and the holidays all but gone, I present a short book list for those intending to take the courses I am offering in February.

1. PENTATEUCH

This is a first year course: an over-all sketch study of the first five books of the Bible. The textbook is    Introduction to the Pentateuch by Roger Whybray which you can purchase quite cheaply at http://www.abebooks.co.uk/servlet/SearchResults?an=whybray&bi=0&bx=off&ds=30&sortby=3&sts=t&tn=pentateuch&x=32&y=3. Check elsewhere on the site for further details of the Pentateuch course.

2. INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE

This is another 1st year course, comprising a brief survey of the major emphases of Christian theology. The textbook is Introduction to Christian Doctrine by Millard Erickson and can be purchased at http://www.abebooks.co.uk/servlet/SearchResults?an=millard&sortby=3&sts=t&tn=doctrine&x=0&y=0

3. REFORMATION HISTORY AND THEOLOGY

This is a 3rd year module, with a strong emphasis on the theology and church praxis of Calvin. It should be of particular interest to those who have studied PURITANISM. The textbook is Timothy George’s  Theology of the reformers  and this can be purchased at  http://www.abebooks.co.uk/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=952827979&searchurl=an%3Dgeorge%26bi%3D0%26bx%3Doff%26ds%3D30%26sortby%3D3%26sts%3Dt%26tn%3Dreformers%26x%3D62%26y%3D11

4. WISDOM LITERATURE

This module covers a sometimes neglected area of OT research study. We will provide an overview of the major Biblical Wisdom books: Job, Proverbs and Ecclesiastes, together with a selection of Psalms and some extra-Biblical texts in the Apocrypha and other ancient writings. The text-book is  William Brown, Character in crisis: A Fresh Approach to Wisdom Literature  which can be purchased quite cheaply at  http://www.abebooks.co.uk/servlet/SearchResults?an=brown&bi=0&bx=off&ds=30&sortby=3&sts=t&tn=character+in+crisis&x=46&y=9

5. OT TEXTS: HABAKKUK

This is a more advanced option. We will be attempting a detailed exegesis of the entire text. Though we will be using an English translation, it will be helpful if you have done at least one module of elementary Hebrew. One of the best recent commentaries (in my opinion) is Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah (New American Commentary) by Kenneth L. Barker and Waylon Bailey (Hardcover - Oct 1998). Click on the link for the Amazon option.



ESLER on Paul and the Law
December 18, 2007, 11:13 pm
Filed under: Romans

Philip Esler used social-identity theory to explain Galatians, and he now uses recategorization theory to account for Romans. They are sibling models, to be sure, but whereas the former focuses on relationships between groups, the latter does so within groups. So in the earlier letter, the Judean influencers must be degraded (in line with the canons of an honor-shame culture) and their tradition radically reinterpreted for the benefit of Paul’s Gentiles. In the second letter, the mixed group of Judean and Gentile Christ-believers, conflicted over ethnic pride, must be “taken down” to the same level, but in such a way that neither group feels that its ethnic identity is erased in the process. (more…)



Celebrate Christmas the Puritan way!
December 17, 2007, 4:43 pm
Filed under: Puritan, Puritan Theology, Puritanism

In the mid-17th century, a wave of religious reform transformed the way in which Christmas was celebrated in England. Oliver Cromwell — a statesman and General responsible for leading the parliamentary army during the English Civil War — took over England in 1645. Supported by his Puritan forces, Cromwell believed it was his mission to cleanse the country of decadence.

In 1644 he enforced an Act of Parliament banning Christmas celebrations. Christmas was regarded by the Puritans as a wasteful festival that threatened core Christian beliefs. Consequently, all activities relating to Christmas, including attending mass, were forbidden. Not surprisingly, the ban was hugely unpopular and many people continued to celebrate Christmas secretly.

The Puritan War on Christmas lasted until 1660. Under the Commonwealth, mince pies, holly and other popular customs fell victim to the spirited Puritan attempt to eradicate every last remnant of merrymaking during the Christmas period.

In the first half of the 17th century Christmas was an important religious festival and a time when the English population would indulge in a variety of traditional pastimes. The 25th December was a public holiday, during which all places of work closed and people attended special church services. The next eleven days included additional masses, with businesses open sporadically and for shorter hours than usual. During the twelve days of Christmas, buildings were dressed with rosemary, holly and ivy and families attended Christmas Day mass. As well as marking the day’s religious elements, there was also non-stop dancing, singing, drinking, exchanging of presents and stage plays. The population indulged in feasts of roast beef, plum porridge, minced pies and special ale. Twelfth Night, the final day of celebration, often saw a fresh bout of feasting and carnivals.

It’s no surprise that the daily celebrations often led to drunkenness, promiscuity, gambling and other forms of excess. Sixteenth and seventeenth century Puritans frowned on what they saw as a frenzy of disorder and disturbance. In the Late 1500’s, Philip Stubbes, a strict protestant expressed the Puritan view in his famed book The Anatomie of Abuses, when he noted:

‘More mischief is that time committed than in all the year besides … What dicing and carding, what eating and drinking, what banqueting and feasting is then used … to the great dishonour of God and the impoverishing of the realm.’

As well as disliking the waste and debauchery that went along with the celebration of Christmas, the Puritans viewed the festival (Christ’s mass) as an unwanted remnant of the Roman Catholic Church and, therefore, a tool of encouragement for the dissentient community that remained in both England and Wales. They argued that nowhere in the Bible had God called upon his people to celebrate the nativity in this manner. They proposed a stricter observance of Sundays, the Lord’s Day, along with banning the immoral celebration of Christmas — as well as Easter, Whitsun and saints’ days. Preferring to call the period Christ-tide, and thus removing the Catholic ‘mass’ element, the Puritans reasoned that it should remain only as a day of fasting and prayer.

King Charles I had largely supported the existing traditions and festivities but, as control passed to the Long Parliament in the mid 1600’s, Parliament set in motion their idea of completely eradicating the celebration of Christmas.

Shortly before the Civil War had begun in January 1642, Charles I had accorded Parliament’s request to make the last Wednesday in each month a day of fasting.

In January 1645 parliament enlisted the help of a group of ministers to create a Directory of Public Worship establishing a new organisation of the church and new forms of worship that were to be adopted and followed in both England and Wales. According to the Directory, the population was to strictly observe Sundays as holy days and were not to recognise other festival days, including Christmas, since they had no biblical justification.

Parliamentary legislation embraced the Directory of Public Worship as the only legal form of worship allowed in England and Wales. Two years later Parliament reinstated the law by passing an Ordinance affirming the abolition of the feasts of Christmas, Easter and Whitsun.

Oliver Cromwell regarded Charles I as an insurgent secret Catholic who was subverting the Protestant faith. The Stuart King was deposed and executed by Cromwell in 1649 and for the next four years England was run by Parliament. But Cromwell had other plans. He regarded the current system as ineffective and damaging to the country. Supported by the army, on 20 April 1653 he led a body of musketeers to Westminster and forcibly expelled parliament. He then established himself as Lord Protector and moved in to the Palace of Whitehall. The spectacular Banqueting House is the only complete building of Whitehall to remain standing to this day. The Palace was famously taken from Cardinal Wolsey by Henry VIII and acted as the Royal residence until the ascension of James I.

The Puritans believed that you would be welcomed in to heaven as long as you worked hard in your lifetime, thus, enjoyment for enjoyments sake was highly disapproved of. Cromwell ordered for inns and playhouses to be shut down, most sports were banned and those caught swearing would receive a fine. Women caught working on the Sabbath could be put in the stocks. They had to wear a long black dress, a white apron, a white headdress and no makeup. The men had an equally sober appearance, dressed head to toe in black and sporting short hair.
All shops and markets were to stay open throughout the 25th December and anyone caught holding or attending a special Christmas church service would suffer a penalty.

In the city of London things were even stricter as soldiers were ordered to patrol the streets, seizing any food they discovered was being prepared for a Christmas celebration.

Despite imposing such rigid measures on the common people, it appears that Cromwell himself didn’t quite live up to his preaching. He liked music, playing bowls and hunting and, after becoming Lord Protectorate, soon took to the high life. For his daughter’s wedding he even permitted a lavish feast and entertainment fit for royalty.

In 1656 legislation was passed to ensure that Sundays were more stringently observed as the Lord’s Day and, thus, a day of rest. The regular monthly fast day had always been hugely unpopular and impossible to enforce and was subsequently dissolved.

Despite the threat of fines and punishment many people continued to celebrate Christmas clandestinely. The ban had never been popular and many people still held mass on the 25th December to mark Christ’s nativity also marked the day as a secular holiday. In the late 1640s Cromwell tried to put a stop to these public celebrations and force businesses to stay open. As a result, violent encounters took place between supporters and opponents of Christmas in many towns, including London, Canterbury and Norwich.

Cromwell was Lord Protector until his death in 1658, whereby Charles II was enthusiastically welcomed back to England to take the throne as the country’s rightful heir.

With the restoration of the monarchy in 1661, Oliver Cromwell was once more a despised figure. Cromwell was originally buried with great ceremony in Westminster Abbey, a famous gothic church in London that houses the tombs of kings and queens dating back to Edward the Confessor, as well as countless memorials to distinguished English subjects. Upon taking the throne, one of the King’s first orders was to exhume Cromwell’s lifeless body and take it to be hung at Tyburn gallows, at the top of Hyde Park near Marble Arch in London. This was the first permanent gallows to be established in London in 1196 and was the main site for public executions until 1783. This site is also famous because 105 Catholic martyrs were put to their deaths here from 1535 to 1681. A convent — founded in 1901 — now stands on the site, in which around 20 nuns live and work. Visitors are welcome to visit the church, which contains several Catholic relics.

Cromwell’s body was decapitated and his head displayed at Westminster Hall for over 20 years. Finished in 1099 this is the oldest surviving section of the Palace of Westminster. The trials of William Wallace, Sir Thomas Moore, Guy Fawkes and King Charles I all took place here, so it was a fitting site at which to display Cromwell’s treacherous head. After changing hands over the next three centuries, in 1960 Cromwell’s head was finally laid to rest at Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge, which he had attended in 1616 to 1617.

Once Charles II was restored to the throne, all legislation banning Christmas — enforced from 1642 to 1660 — was dropped and the common people were once again allowed to mark the Twelve Days of Christmas. Old traditions were revived with renewed enthusiasm and Christmas was celebrated throughout the country as both a religious and secular festival.

http://www.timetravel-britain.com/05/Dec/ban.shtml



“Will I find faith on earth?” The new cultural divide
December 15, 2007, 2:08 pm
Filed under: Atheist, CONTEMPORISMS, Christianity, God, Searching for God

Britain’s new cultural divide is not between Christian and Muslim, Hindu and Jew. It is between those who have faith and those who do not. Stuart Jeffries reports on the vicious and uncompromising battle between believers and non-believers

The GuardianProtesters from different faiths join to oppose proposed new regulations on gay adoption
Protesters from different faiths join to oppose proposed new regulations on gay adoption. Photograph: Martin Godwin
 

The American journalist HL Mencken once wrote: “We must accept the other fellow’s religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart.” In Britain today, such wry tolerance is diminishing. (more…)



Romans: The final round-up
December 14, 2007, 11:03 am
Filed under: Romans

The assignment will be a study of Paul and Law. It will have four sections: an interpretive section on Rom 3:21-31;A lesson plan for a 45 minute class on Rom 7:7-25; a sermon on Rom 11:25-32; and an exegetical  section on Rom 14. 

Here is an article paul-and-the-law.doc that may suggest some ideas/ background reading and offer a wider perspective on a complex and controversial subject. One or two have asked how they might approach the exegesis of Romans 14 in relation to “Law” and so I offer this article at http://www.wcg.org/lit/bible/rom/rom14.htm as a suggestion how you might proceed.

A couple of caveats:

1. Remember, as you re-format your blog-work and bring the completed paper in, that you are considering -quite narrowly- Paul’s views only in the above mentioned passages. Don’t be tempted to branch out into a wider discussion or your completed work will lack the required depth.

2. Keep in mind that the project title is Paul and the Law. It is not intended that you do a sketch commentary of everything within the set passages: only a consideration of how those passages contribute to the title subject. Email any queries on this one.



Meanwhile in other parts of the world…(Pray!)
December 12, 2007, 11:12 pm
Filed under: Prayer, Searching for God

Paul said “Remember to pray…”.

So often I forget.

If you have space in your prayer times (!). Check these out: (more…)



Missiology Assignment
December 10, 2007, 5:55 pm
Filed under: Assignments 07, Missiology

The office is now open to receive hardcopy of your module assignment:

The student will produce a 3000 word assignment entitled: What are the Biblical Foundations of Mission? The assignment will  comprise a) an introduction to the theme of “The Bible as a Mission Book”, b) a  cumulative summary of the mission emphasis from each section of the Bible; c) a critique of Glasser d) a Bibliography

Glasser, Arthur. Announcing the Kingdom. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 2003.      

ADDED NOTE: It has been suggested that your critique of Glasser might serve as an introduction to the assignment and this is completely acceptable.



Romans 9: Arminius’ view
December 10, 2007, 5:50 pm
Filed under: Arminian, Romans

http://classicalarminianism.blogspot.com

“For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, ‘For this very purpose I raised you up [allowed you to remain -Ex. 9.16], to demonstrate My power in you, and that My name might be proclaimed throughout the whole earth.’ So then He has mercy on whom He desires, and he hardens whom He desires” (Rom. 9.17-18. NASB). (more…)



Romans 13: Should Christians be doormats?
December 9, 2007, 5:41 pm
Filed under: NEW TESTAMENT, PAULINE EPISTLES, Romans

rc_notdoormat_thumbnail.jpg 

Here’s some notes on this week’s seminar should-christians-be-doormats.doc and the notes from the “Church and Israel” discussion on Romans 9-11 rom-9-11.doc. I’ve included the sermon on Romans 11 sermon-rom-1133-36.doc to give you an idea how yours might look. The two PowerPoint outlines are here romans-lecture-12.ppt and here romans-lecture-11.ppt and here is the PowerPoint lecture on  romans-13.ppt.

We are getting ready now for the last bit of our assignment project, based on an exegesis of Romans 14 in relation to Paul’s view of the Law. This week we are considering Paul’s view of civic responsibility, as outlined in Romans 13:1-7. (Check out Esler Confliuct and Identity through these next two weeks. He is exceptional, plus other links through http://ntgateway.com ).

Here’s how your assignment should be shaping up ready for delivery by Christmas:

The assignment will be a study of Paul and Law. It will have four sections: an interpretive section on Rom 3:21-31;A lesson plan for a 45 minute class on Rom 7:7-25; a sermon on Rom 11:25-32; and an exegetical  section on Rom 14. 



Early Church History: Key People
December 9, 2007, 5:09 pm
Filed under: Early Church History

demetrius.jpg 

Two of the key people that we have considered in this module are  Irenaeus and Athanasius. This week we hope to wrap our discussion comparing and contrasting the work of each.

Here are the relevant texts on  athanasius-of-alexandria.doc and irenaeus.doc plus an opportunity to read through Athanasius’ classic work de-incarnatione-athnasius.doc

Finally, here’s some Key People links for your edification: (more…)